From his abstract: This short essay focuses on a linguistic (and therefore textualist) principle overlooked in the trio of Title VII cases currently before the U.S. Supreme Court: compositionality.

The acting chair of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) — Andrea Lucas — announced in February that she ...

A panel of judges pushed the EEOC and attorneys for an employee alleging sex discrimination on whether a third-party staffing company that placed the athletic trainer at a high school is liable under ...

For example, the EEOC quotes its religion guidance to explain that a religious organization can raise the Title VII exemption as a defense when the organization “made the challenged employment ...

The prevailing legal test for Title VII claims comes from the 1973 case McDonnell Douglas ... telling an applicant that he didn’t hire her because she’s a woman, for example—or circumstantial evidence ...

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended in 1972, 1978 and the Civil Rights Act of 1991 The most prominent source of anti-bias employment rules is Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of ...

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s new enforcement push against anti-American employer practices is poised to test ...

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, an employment discrimination lawsuit that ...

In a recent oral argument, the Justices seemed largely aligned with the plaintiff’s position that majority and historically disadvantaged ...